j1mmyd3an

Hi Garth, the hardware inventory is set on a simple schedule. I'll make the changes recommended in your article and see if that helps. Thanks for your suggestions.

Hardware is scheduled to run weekly. I use this report to locate PCs that a user has logged on to. It's come in very handy in the past, and when I realized that a huge number of my users aren't listed to run the report against it made me start to question where this was all breaking down.

Thank you for getting back to me, I really appreciate your insight. What I'm really struggling with is that there are at least 20000 users that aren't represented in this report. I figured it had to do with my discovery data but as I mentioned before, all my users show up correctly in my "All Users" collection. At some point I'm sure the HW inventory ran with one of these 20000 users logged on. I'm just stumped as to where I need to look next. Thanks again for taking the time.

Thanks Garth, fair enough. Do you have any ideas as to why my canned report for "computers for a specific user name" wouldn't have any data on a large portion of my users?

Hi Garth, thanks for your reply. Here is the query I found online. SELECT SMS_R_System.LastLogonUserName, SMS_R_System.Name, SMS_R_System.LastLogonUserDomain, SMS_R_System.LastLogonTimestamp FROM SMS_R_System WHERE SMS_R_System.LastLogonUserName = ##PRM:SMS_R_System.LastLogonUserName##

Hi there, I've run into an issue with the canned report for "computers for a specific user name". When I run the report I can only see a partial list of the users in my organization. I thought it was related to my discovery configuration but my generic "All Users" collection is a complete list of all my users. I created a query manually using info I found online and it gives the same kind of results. The query returns results on some users but not all. This leads me to believe that SCCM hasn't got this data stored in it's database, but it has got the users discovered as displayed in my "All Users" collection. My question is, can anyone point me in the direction of getting all my user data available to query? I have no idea why it's only partially working. Thank you for your assistance, and for running a great forum.

No I have not applied this fix. When I first read about it I didn't think it really applied in this case but after reading the description it just might. I'm hesitant only because I have 40 other servers as distribution points all configured the same and I have never run across this issue. Clearly I botched something in this servers config but I'm really stumped. I really appreciate your response. This is an outstanding forum. Cheers!

Thank you for your response. The server NIC is set to auto and linked at 1Gbps. When I copy files to and from the server in question I can max out it's gigabit connection. This issue occurs only when serving an image to clients.

Hi there, I have a strange issue I haven't been able to resolve. I have one distribution point in our SCCM 2012 R2 environment that will not exceed 100 Mbps when clients are being imaged. For example, 5 clients PXE boot to the DP and begin running a task sequence. Each client gets 20 Mbps. When one client completes, the remaining 4 clients get 25 Mbps, and so on. This DP was not configured to behave this way intentionally and I have been unsuccessful trying to locate any setting to manipulate it. I have read posts about rate limiting inside IIS but none of that is configured. During client imaging while the server NIC is "stuck" at 100 Mbps, I can easily copy large amounts of data to the server and max out the 1 Gbps connection it is on. All of our distribution points are identical and I'm really stumped so I've come here for help. If anyone has any insight on how to troubleshoot this it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Hi there, I've been trying (struggling) to modify the pre-canned report "Computers with low memory (less than or equal to specified MB) in a specific collection". I have very little experience with SQL reporting but am trying to pick up what I can. My first goal with this report was to modify it so that a collection could be specified at runtime and that works. Now I would like to add 2 additional columns to the report for Computer Manufacturer and Computer Model. I am able to get those columns to show up with data in them but the data doesn't match up with the existing columns. These 2 columns seem to be ignoring the collection restriction and are populating with all computers. Here is the query: SELECT Distinct Manufacturer0,Model0,SYS.Netbios_Name0, SYS.Operating_System_Name_and0, MEM.TotalPhysicalMemory0/1024 As C083 FROM v_GS_SYSTEM_ENCLOSURE, fn_rbac_R_System(@UserSIDs) SYS JOIN fn_rbac_GS_X86_PC_MEMORY(@UserSIDs) MEM on SYS.ResourceID = MEM.ResourceID join v_fullcollectionmembership fcm on fcm.resourceid=sys.resourceid WHERE fcm.collectionid = @COLLID and MEM.TotalPhysicalMemory0/1024 <= @variable I have bolded in red the additional parts of the query that I would like to populate the 2 new columns with. I know this is incorrect but I am stuck in my troubleshooting. Could some please assist in making this all happen? As always, thanks for your assistance.

Hi there, for the past few months I have been running a trouble-free SCCM 2012 SP1 environment. I have started to explore some additional functionality and decided that I would like to have the ConfigMgr client installed on my remote distribution points so I can do some patch management on the servers. As soon as I installed the client on the DPs, WDS stopped working. The only way for me to get WDS to load back up is to disable multicast on my DPs. This is not ideal as I would really like to continue using this feature. This has all been working great for months and this is the only change I have done. I really don't want to have to manually manage patching these servers so I'd like to be able to keep the client installed on these servers. Does anyone know if there is some compatibility issue between the ConfigMgr client and WDS Multicast? I have had very little success searching for answers so I thought I'd post here. If anyone has any ideas I'd love to hear them. Thanks!

Well it looks like I spoke too soon. Imaging is back to not working again. Same timeout error message as before. It was nice while it lasted...

OK so I just wanted to post an update. I changed one setting on all of my distribution points; I unchecked "Allow fallback source location for content". This setting has been enabled and working fine for 3 weeks so I don't know what happened, but now my imaging works again. I have successfully deployed 5 workstations since unchecking that option. It may be a coincidence but since making that change everything is back to working. Anyway, I'm keeping that setting disabled and I'll post back with an update if anything changes.

I checked with our network guys and we do run spanning tree, but what really bothers me is that this was a working setup up until yesterday. It's been running really well for at least 3 weeks and out of the blue it craps out like this. I've been working on this all day today with no joy at all. The only thing that is consistant is that the image download will fail at a random % every time with the 0x80072EE2 error. Bummer... I'll update if I discover anything new. Thanks for the suggestion.

Hi there, I just wanted to bump this to say I just starting experiencing this as well. My system has been running fine for approx. 3 weeks and then all of a sudden this starts happening. SCCM 2012 SP1 running on Windows Server 2012 + all Windows updates Primary Site Server - Windows Server 2012 SQL Server - SQL Server 2012 34 Distribution Points - Windows Server 2012 The whole system has been working amazing, then I start getting calls about OSD not working. It seems to have broken on multiple DPs with the error code 0x80072EE2. This is across multiple locations on multiple networks. I don't know if it's broken on all DPs but there have been reports from multiple locations. Imaging will fail at a random % with error code 0x80072EE2 which seems to reference a "network connection failed" type message. I haven't been able to track down the culprit yet so if anyone has a suggestion, it would be most welcome. Thank you.