baschuel

Unfortunately, not yet responded to this interesting question. I am also very interested in opinions on this. Somewhere i read about that you only need a secondary site in sccm2012 if you have many clients and a slow bandwith. In Kent Agerlunds new Book "SCCM 2012 - Mastering the fundamentals" he recommend installing a secondary site at remote locations if one of the following statements is true: - The Remote locations have more than 500 and fewer than 5000 clients - you need to compress traffic going to the site - you need to control the upward flowing traffic - you need a local management point - you need a local SUP We have locations with more than 500 and fewer than 5000 clients but with a good connection and good bandwith. Should i install a Secondary Site oder just a distribution Point? hmpf..