regan Posted June 13, 2014 Report post Posted June 13, 2014 Since upgrading from 2012-SP1-R2 i haven't been able to upgrade the clients, im fairly sure now after a fair amount of research this is down to the distribution point. I would assume that if there was an issue with the distribution point the update wouldn't be sent to the clients. Im fairly sure i have the automatic updated all done, via the Hierarchy settings. Its only when i went to distribute content on one of my packages i realised that the issue might be with the MP/DP as i get "failed to distribute content details will be available after server finishes processing" In distmgr.log i get "package sitename00002 does not have a preferred sender. Used 0 out of 3 allow processing threads In smsdpmon.log There is nothing for months which was my next check. I have Noticed that there inst a SMS_DP$ folder but i do have a inetpub folder ( IIS ) Tried removing and Adding the DP which had no effect. Is there any other logs which might give me an error code 3 to try and work out what the issue is? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter van der Woude Posted June 13, 2014 Report post Posted June 13, 2014 That package is probably your client package (looking at the number). In most cases an update distribution point action will solve this problem. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
regan Posted June 16, 2014 Report post Posted June 16, 2014 it hasn't , assume it wouldn't if the SMS_DP$ folder is missing? It seems some packages distribute to the DP and some dont. also ive tried to run the windowsupdateagent manually and it says its corrupt ( i found this in my old configuration manager client package location) Shouldnt there be a new location where the new client has been created? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
regan Posted June 19, 2014 Report post Posted June 19, 2014 Do i need to manually create a new client in order to update or would this have been done during the SP1-R2 update ? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...