Apexes Posted September 14, 2015 Report post Posted September 14, 2015 Hi folks, Recently, i've been noticing the compliance of software updates proving to be somewhat strange, wondered if anyone else had similar? Example, September 2015's updates were downloaded and deployed last week, and i'm getting odd reports of required and not required, therefore affecting compliance. All machines on my network use the exact same base image. Any idea why some of them report as required, but others say not required when they're running the exact same system image, along with same previous patches? Users are unable to install software themselves, and core programs such as IE would only ever be updated with patches. Screenshot example attached, any advice or wisdom appreciated. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
