Nayr eggop Posted November 11, 2015 Report post Posted November 11, 2015 Any opinions appreciated. I am sure this gets asked alot since there is really no definitive answer and every situation is different. Deploying SCCM for the first time. I have three main sites A: 300 PCs B: 200 PCs 45Mb WAN back to site A C: 200 PCs 45Mb WAN back to site A and 6 small remote offices (less than 20 users each) Between 1Mb and 3Mb WAN each I am considering deploying a Primary Site Server at site A, and Distribution Points at all other locations. Should I be considering Secondary Site servers with co-located DP's MP's at site B and site C ? I think the number of users is very low considering, and I think it would be more management than its worth to do secondaries... The database replication might be >= the management traffic for that many users anyway ? Thanks for any input! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eswar Koneti Posted November 12, 2015 Report post Posted November 12, 2015 You can go with 1 Primary Site at A and rest can go with Distribution Points at other locations without looking at secondary site . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
