Is it completely unheard of to use separate boot images for different PC model's driver packages? It seems like it should be unnecessary, but I have HP elitebooks (99% of our environment) and then about a dozen Alienware R4s I recently became responsible for and the last time I tried to use those drivers in my x64 boot image it broke the OSD operation for the HPs and I ended up having to nuke my boot image and rebuild it.
I have everything fixed now and image deployment works again for the HPs, but I need to capture an Alienware image with totally different NIC and storage drivers and don't want it to screw up the working boot image.
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.
Just a quick question:
Is it completely unheard of to use separate boot images for different PC model's driver packages? It seems like it should be unnecessary, but I have HP elitebooks (99% of our environment) and then about a dozen Alienware R4s I recently became responsible for and the last time I tried to use those drivers in my x64 boot image it broke the OSD operation for the HPs and I ended up having to nuke my boot image and rebuild it.
I have everything fixed now and image deployment works again for the HPs, but I need to capture an Alienware image with totally different NIC and storage drivers and don't want it to screw up the working boot image.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites