RS1 Posted July 16, 2013 Report post Posted July 16, 2013 In our environment we name our web servers like this; UKWEB-SVR01A UKWEB-SVR01B Then we create a NLB cluster named UKWEB-SVR01 So, for example, the cluster UKSQL-SVR03 is formed from UKSQL-SVR03A, UKSQL-SVR03B and UKSQL-SVR03C. The individual machines are all getting the agent correctly. However, SCCM also discovers the NLB cluster and attempts to install the client to that too. How do I stop SCCM trying to do this? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS1 Posted July 30, 2013 Report post Posted July 30, 2013 Nobody found a way around this yet? I would imagine it was a fairly common issue. Any help very gratefully received. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocket Man Posted July 30, 2013 Report post Posted July 30, 2013 Is this what you are looking for? Never had to do it but remember seeing some articles quite some time ago and remembered it was a registry setting and was of high interest......the link is not the article I first seen but it is the same procedure. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS1 Posted July 30, 2013 Report post Posted July 30, 2013 I'll give that a try. Thanks! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocket Man Posted July 30, 2013 Report post Posted July 30, 2013 If it works which I can only assume it will as this was not the only article describing the same procedure...... will you report back so that others may also see the solution if they have the same needs. Thanks Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS1 Posted July 30, 2013 Report post Posted July 30, 2013 Will do. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS1 Posted August 6, 2013 Report post Posted August 6, 2013 OK. This is not quite doing what we'd like, if indeed that is possible. The client no longer goes out to these machines but they still show in collections and we'd like to avoid that. Still some way to go I think but a definite improvement so thanks for that, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocket Man Posted August 7, 2013 Report post Posted August 7, 2013 Maybe be more specific in your system discovery method...instead of having discovery at the root of the domain....set indiviual discoveries on selected OUs'....and leave the OUs' out that these systems are in..... this could be more what you are looking for Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...